With parts of Nepal`s ruling Communist Party expressing reservations about the pact, which calls it an integral part of the US strategy, the agreement has still not been ratified after three years after the pact was signed by both governments. Amid the controversy over the U.S. aid program, the leaders of Nepal`s ruling Communist Party recently agreed to ratify the pact after some revisions. Some heads of state or government have proposed asking the United States to request certain provisions of the agreement. However, the MCC Residence Office in Nepal said the United States had not yet received a communication seeking clarification. Since CMC financial assistance must be approved by the U.S. Congress, the U.S. government expects the same commitment from host countries. That is why most countries ratify the MCC pact through their parliaments. However, their agreements do not say that in the event of a contraction, the provisions of the pact will take precedence over national laws, according to the expert who previously worked for the MCA. The signing of the pact will take place on September 14, 2017 in Washington, D.C., between Nepal and the MCC, in the State Department`s contract room. Finance Minister Gyanendra Bahadur Karki and McC Chief Jonathan Nash have designated the compact agreement.
Anyone with questions about what the MCC is – or not – can make these facts, all the data and all the data regarding the MCC in Nepal, and a lot of information about mcc.gov In paragraph 2.7, it is clearly stated that funds cannot be used for the military, but some readers look at Section 6.8, which provides immunity for MCC employees in „all jurisdictions in Nepal.“ „“ and fear that it could be used for military purposes. There is no doubt that diplomats should continue to enjoy diplomatic immunity, but should immunity be granted for other activities? Isn`t that a violation of Nepal`s sovereignty? In particular, there are concerns that the MCC agreement could compete in Nepal with China in the United States. The report on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy of June 1, 2019 makes it very clear that China is a revisionist power and threat while Nepal maintains friendly relations with China. Nepal`s mentality has been deeply shaken by India`s harmless 2015 blockade.